COST ACTION + hand-smaller.jpg

 

THIS WEBSITE IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION!

 

NEWS :

Scientific Kickoff Meeting : 16/17 February 2012

            Click here for draft Programme

Next Management Committee Meeting is schedules for 16 February 2012

Click Here for HOW TO JOIN ACTION

 

Objectives

Bio-Plasma will intensify the knowledge base relevant to medical and biomedical applications of atmospheric pressure plasma technology within Europe, and raise the general awareness of the potential of this technology via the establishment of a communication platform. The network will look towards early exploitation of plasma treatment techniques with enormous potential for patient care, particularly to reduce infection, enhance the speed of wound healing and treat cancer.

 

 

About Us

 

Providing health care at tolerable cost is one of the greatest challenges facing the world in this century. Technologies that may offer enhanced quality of care at reduced cost, such as plasma technology, will be of immense societal and commercial value. This action will focus on medical and biomedical applications of low-temperature, non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasmas, in fields including surface treatment of biomedical devices, sterilisation, and therapeutic techniques, such as wound sterilisation and cancer treatment. This is an interdisciplinary topic: The Action will involve clinicians, biologists, chemists and physicists, together with industrialists ready to exploit the results. The collective purpose of the participants in this Action is to develop synergistic links between their research programmes, and to take full advantage of the opportunities that follow to create a leadership position for Europe in this important emerging area

 

Working Groups

WG1

Plasma Therapeutics

WG2

Functional Coatings for Biomaterials

WG3

Bio-Plasma Interactions

WG4

Plasma Sources for Biomedical Applications

WG1: Plasma Therapeutics.

The Action will study plasma treatment of wounds (to promote healing) and plasma suppression of tumours. In both cases, there is evidence that plasma treatment can be efficacious, but the mechanisms involved are uncertain. Animal experiments show that wound infection is reduced and healing accelerated by a course of plasma treatment. It is thought that plasma treatment eliminates infectious agents from the wound, but it has also been suggested that the patient's own immune system may be stimulated by the plasma. There are also indications that the direct action of electric fields may be important in both cancer treatment and wound healing. There are, naturally, concerns about safety, and the nature of any adverse effects of the plasma needs to be better understood. In particular, the effect of the plasma on cell death by aptosis and necrosis, and on cell proliferation needs to be studied in more detail.

The Action aims to develop a programme of plasma measurement and modelling combined with process characterisation that will shed light on the dominant mechanisms and facilitate process optimisation. This is the most challenging and consequently the riskiest of the work areas, but also the one with the greatest potential for innovation and the growth of entirely new ideas.

Issues of particular concern are:

  • Selectivity is of crucial importance. The plasma must destroy pathogens or malignant cells in preference to healthy tissue. The origin of this selectivity needs to be understood.
  • There almost certainly are adverse side-effects, such as DNA damage, for example, because of UV radiation. The Action will attempt to establish the nature of any adverse effects, and determine safe limits for plasma exposure.
  • Characterisation and quantification of the effects of plasma exposure must be carried out in a manner that facilitates comparison between experiments carried out by different partners. The Action must agree upon some common techniques, and the methodology for applying them. (This will be essential to the effective operation of the Action, but also valuable for the global scientific community.)
  • Critical evaluation and comparison of experiments conducted using different plasma sources may allow identification of the reagents responsible for the principle therapeutic effects and for side effects. If this is so, then the Action may lead to insight into the nature of an optimal plasma source.
  • Some modelling studies have appeared with relevance to plasma-cell interactions, especially concerning the influence of electric fields. The partners in the Action will consider whether to initiate modelling studies addressing these questions.

WG2: Functional Coatings for Biomaterials.

Prostheses and biomedical devices generally are of increasing importance. These are sometimes temporary (such as catheters) but may be permanent or semi-permanent (such as stents or replacement joints). These devices interact directly with living tissue. Their surfaces mediate this interaction and are of critical importance. However, the relationship between surface characteristics and performance in vivo is not well understood. The aim of this project is to understand the relationship between measurable surface characteristics and in vivo behaviour, using in vitro studies as an intermediate step, and hence to understand how to produce high performance biocompatible coatings using plasma processes. Particular areas of concern are:

  • It is not certain what chemical functionality and physical morphology leads to an optimally biocompatible surface, and indeed there may be no universal solution. In vitro studies of cell growth on plasma processed surfaces with well-characterised properties can shed light on this question. Combined studies involving biologists, materials scientists and plasma experts will be a focus for the Action, again coordinating nationally funded programmes to achieve synergistic outcomes.
  • If the nature of the surface to be produced is understood, then the development of a plasma source or sources optimised for this can be pursued. It is not immediately clear what properties of the plasma source are of primary importance, and this is an issue that the Action must address.
  • In some cases, the ability to incorporate therapeutic agents into films may be important, for example to enhance initial integration of an implant or reduce the risk of inducing a thombosis. A carefully designed plasma process may be able to incorporate such agents without otherwise compromising the coating.

WG3: Bio-Plasma Interactions.

Plasmas are effective sterilisation agents, often with the advantage that a surprising degree of selectivity can be exhibited, which may even make plasma sterilisation of skin a practical possibility. However, the mechanisms are not well known, and process development is difficult. In particular, biofilms can be found in many contamination scenarios (e.g., oral, wound, food), and present a physical barrier to impinging plasmas. Current evidence shows plasma efficacy against immature biofilm but less so against mature biofilm. A key question is how plasma chemistry and plasma delivery could be manipulated to enable effective destruction of biofilm.

The following issues are of particular interest:

  • A variety of plasma sources have shown some effectiveness against biofilms. However, different plasma sources have been employed against different biofilms, which makes it difficult to draw any general conclusions. The Action will address this issue either by defining procedures for producing biofilm samples, or by exchanging samples between partners.
  • Such a programme could reveal that different biofilms are destroyed by different reagents, or that destruction of biofilm requires different plasma conditions to those required for destruction of bacteria. If this is so, then a fully effective procedure might involve either multiple plasma sources or a single plasma source with time modulated characteristics. The Action will attempt to address this question by systematically treating similar biofilm samples with different plasma sources, by combining the capabilities of several partners.

WG4: Plasma Sources for Biomedical Applications.

A key aim of the action is to develop plasma sources optimised for particular biomedical applications. This entails a programme of plasma diagnostic development and application, and close dialogue with clinicians and application experts, directed at understanding the role of specific agents produced by the plasma. Examples of the issues to be addressed are listed under the headings above.

With the exception of applying biocompatible coatings, the applications of interest involve operation of the plasma in a regulated environment where the use of potentially toxic gases is not permissible. Consequently, most of these applications must function with a mixture of atmospheric gases, possibly with non-toxic additives such as rare gases. Humid air chemistry, although extensively studied, is complex and there are many radical species that might prove important. At present, it is not known whether different plasma sources produce systematically different kinds or proportions of reactive species, nor is it known how to manipulate the chemical composition of the effluent from a plasma source.

 

  • The Action will review the diagnostic techniques that are available for atmospheric pressure plasma. Many traditional plasma diagnostics (Langmuir probes, certain spectroscopic techniques) are unsuitable for use in atmospheric pressure plasmas, so that plasma characterisation is difficult and sometimes controversial. This situation is an impediment to systematic studies of atmospheric pressure plasma applications. The Action will establish best practice across the partners, and facilitate widespread adoption of that best practice.
  • The Action will design a collective programme that will lead to a systematic characterisation of the atmospheric pressure plasma sources in use by the partners, with the aim of revealing whether the sources differ in ways that affect their suitability for applications. (For example, the character of the plasma produced by low-pressure sources does not essentially depend on the excitation mechanism. It is not known if this is true of atmospheric pressure sources.)
  • The Action will investigate how the radical composition varies with the gas composition (for example, by varying the ratio of oxygen and nitrogen), and attempt to correlate the varying radical species densities with the results of application experiments. This procedure might not be economically attractive in practice, but it may be a scientifically fruitful approach to understanding the basic mechanisms in applications. The most important results will come from a coordinated approach between the partners, leveraging the resources of national programmes.
  • In addition to physico-chemical characteristics, other properties of the plasma sources may be important. For example, in many relevant applications, the ability to process the surface of an irregularly shaped object with a large area in a reasonable time is desirable. Techniques for achieving this end will be an important focus of the Action.
  • The Action will also coordinate modelling activities across the partners. Particularly because of the difficulties with experimental characterisation, modelling may give powerful insights into the physics and chemistry of discharges. But different groups are adopting different approaches, which likely have complementary strengths. Critical comparison of these models, together with validation of models by pooling experimental data from the partners will be important, and will be facilitated by a widespread adoption of best practice in diagnostics, as discussed above.

 

The Action will establish Working Groups in each of these areas. The membership of these groups will be cross-disciplinary and consist of both academic, clinical and industrial partners. Other Working Groups may be established by the Management Committee. The Working Groups will identify and coordinate activities that support the scientific development of the research area and highlight areas of innovation.


 

 

Contact Us

bioplasma@dcu.ie

 

Scientific Kickoff Meeting : 16/17 February 2012

 

Programme

DAY 1 :       16 Feb 2012

Start

Duration

 

WP1 Session

09:00:00

00:30:00

Overview by Dr. Jean‐Michel Pouvesle WP Leader

09:30:00

00:30:00

Jurgen Schlegel (TU Munich)

10:00:00

01:00:00

Open Discussion

11:00:00

00:30:00

COFFEE

WP2 Session

11:30:00

00:20:00

Overview by Prof. Uros Cvelbar WP Leader (or nominee)

11:50:00

00:20:00

P. Favia (Italy)

12:10:00

00:20:00

A. Shukurov (Czech Republic)

12:30:00

00:20:00

C. Canal Barnils (Spain)

12:50:00

00:40:00

Open Discussion

13:30:00

01:00:00

LUNCH + MC

Key Note Session

14:30:00

01:00:00

Prof WG Graham

15:30:00

02:00:00

Poster Session on Community Activity - Poster to be presentated by each participating laboratory on Current Research focus, Key Research Staff and group size, Major facilities.

17:30:00

 

End

Day 2 :        17 Feb 2012

WP3 Session

09:00:00

00:30:00

Overview by Prof. Thomas von Woedtke WP Leader (or nominee)

09:30:00

00:30:00

Zdenko Machala (Slovakia)

10:00:00

01:00:00

Open Discussion

11:00:00

00:30:00

COFFEE

WP4 Session

11:30:00

00:20:00

Overview by Dr. Deborah O'Connell WP Leader (or nominee)

11:50:00

00:20:00

Jan Benedikt (Germany)

12:10:00

00:20:00

Tomo Murakami (Tokyo)

12:30:00

00:20:00

Svetlana Starikovskaya (France)

12:50:00

00:40:00

Open Discussion

13:30:00

00:10:00

Meeting Close

 

HOW TO JOIN

 

If you wish to join this Action and participate in our Scientific Kick-Off meeting please send a 200 word motivation on why you wish to join along with a ONE page CV [PDF ONLY] to bioplasma@dcu.ie.  Please also indicate which Work Groups you are interested in joining (See details below).

Your details will then be added to the mailing list for the Action.

 

EU-FLAG_cmyk
MPNSblue150dpi
ESF Logo small2